roadlooki.blogg.se

1. Difference entre dxo photolab et dxo optics pro 9 how to#
2. Difference entre dxo photolab et dxo optics pro 9 software#

Writing and updating lists of keywords and captions is a work in progress.

Difference entre dxo photolab et dxo optics pro 9 software#

On top of that Picasa, which I extensively used, is discontinued.ĭifferent combinations of software (Lyn, Houdah Geo, Picasa etc.) didn’t give an efficient workflow.Īt the center of organizing and searching I use keywords in the IPTC Stationary Pad. When I switched from Windows to Mac a year ago, I found out, that FastStone Viewer and Geosetter, which I previously used, are not available for Mac. Seems I need to reacquaint myself with Photo Mechanic! If you're willing to expend some extra effort for the not guaranteed but likely noticeably superior performance at times, (and personally I think even your 'name' suggests that you are!) you'll enjoy the entire learning experience with RawTherapee. Your regular post processing program will be better in these cases. You'll 'know' if RawTherapee is going to work well or not after you've done this a few times, and won't waste time trying to tweak its many adjustments if it isn't worth it. I still haven't been able to figure out exactly what sort of photos these are, so my approach has always been to give it a quick try with any given shot. It won't be your 'go-to' processing software, because it will only show its strength with a small fraction of your shots. The most important thing to know is that it only seems to work particularly well with certain photos.

Having said that, I also have to say that there are some unusual aspects to using it. The only reason I'm not using it currently is that I'm stuck with an under-powered laptop for the foreseeable future, and this software requires a halfway decent amount of hardware space and speed. In some ways (at some times) nothing else can touch it. writing captions, keywords, copyright infoĮverything can be done as batch processing and one can tweak the functions to one's needs.It integrates very nicely with DxO, meaning I can control from PM, which images I want to edit in DxO.

Difference entre dxo photolab et dxo optics pro 9 how to#

But once you’ve figured out how to do things, it’s an amazing and very flexible tool. It’s not cheap and quite complex with a steep learning curve because of all the features. I use folders for that and rely on keywords to find certain images.įor organizing images and my workflow I use Photo Mechanic Not a big problem for me, as I never used it to organize my images. LR6 will work as long as it does and then bye-bye Lightroom. I just read in the news, that the Lightroom as standalone is dead. Thirty years ago, in the 'earlier' era of personal computing, I very quickly came to the conclusion that everythingAdobe did was a big useless pain in the butt for no logical reason other than their own benefit.